UFO spotted at the royal wedding venue, as predicted.

Looks like Prince William and fiancée Kate Middleton will have some unexpected guests at their royal wedding.

A tourist has reportedly filmed a UFO hovering over Westminster Abbey - the venue for Friday's Royal Wedding.

The two-and-a half-minute video footage shows a shimmering white object in a cloudless blue sky near Big Ben.

It seems to move and shift shape - but to have three sections, like the starship USS Enterprise from TV's Star Trek.

"First we thought it was a parachute but it was way too high up," the Sun quoted the tourist as posting it on the Internet.

"It changed shape but stayed there for at least 30 minutes. Then I lost sight of it," the tourist added."

The sighting emerged shortly after retired US Air Force major predicted extra-terrestrials would visit Earth to see William and Middleton tie the knot.

Source: times of india

Older post: Prediction from US Airforce officer, here.

Russian UFO crash, really making a buzz online!

Unbelievable. Even top news agencies actually bother to include this apparently obvious hoax on their websites. I was just browsing for some UFO news this evening when I stumbled upon this link belonging to International Business Times.

The economic voice too, seems to have taken interest in this footage. Some more include the Daily Mail, Telegraph.co.uk, East Anglian Daily times and The Sun.

Why? Why is this happening? I have a theory in this regard. I believe, this footage is deliberately allowed to circulate around the internet in the hopes of being rejected as a hoax. For all you know, this could be real alright? The Roswell incident of 1946 is still fresh in people's minds, merely because of this evidence of what looked like an elaborate cover-up (large number of personnel and equipment at the site just to clear a weather balloon?). Or, perhaps the Russian government is probably studying the media's reaction? In either case, a cover-up is certainly not in their agenda. Otherwise, I wouldn't be posting this here right now. I'm just a college guy with an interest on UFOs, after all!

FBI releases fresh UFO document

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has released documents which could prove aliens landed in New Mexico more than sixty years ago.

The FBI has recently launched a new online resource called The Vault on its official website, and it contains documents on Roswell UFO sightings, as well as hundreds of pages of information on UFO sightings in general.

Among the thousands of files published in The Vault is a memo that appears to prove aliens in flying saucers did land in New Mexico prior to 1950.

The memo was written to the FBI director from Guy Hottel, the special agent in charge of the Washington field office in 1950.

In the memo, whose subject line is “Flying Saucers,” Agent Hottel reveals that an Air Force investigator had stated that “Three so-called flying saucers had been recovered in New Mexico.”

The investigator gave the information to a special agent, he went on to say.

The FBI has censored both the agent and the investigator's identity.

“They were described as being circular in shape with raised centers, approximately 50 feet in diameter,” Agent Hottel went on to write.

The bodies were “dressed in a metallic cloth of a very fine texture. Each body was bandaged in a manner similar to the blackout suits used by speed flyers and test pilots.”

He pointed out that the informant, whose identity was censored in the memo, claimed the saucers had been found in New Mexico “due to the fact that the government has a very high-powered radar set-up in that area and it is believed the radar interferes with the controlling mechanism of the saucers.”

He then stated that the special agent did not attempt to investigate further.

The town of Roswell in New Mexico became infamous after reports that a flying saucer had crashed there in 1947.

The bodies of aliens were said to have been recovered and autopsied by the US military, but American authorities allegedly covered the incident up.

Another memo published in The Vault from 1947 claimed that an object “purporting to be a flying disc” had been recovered near Roswell.


Source: OpEdNews

How UFO Sightings Continue to Impact Shares of Lockheed Martin and Boeing

By Cory Bortnicker January 31, 2011 12:45 PM

Now I’m no conspiracy nut, but it’s pretty much an established fact that UFOs are here, and the only possible explanation for them is that inter-dimensional beings have teleported to our universe and worked out a deal by which they share their technology with us in exchange for access to our reproductive organs.

It’s also pretty much agreed upon that the corporate benefactors of this technology are companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, both of which use their passenger jet divisions as cover for their more sinister pursuits, particularly their reverse engineered aircraft that they deploy to game the stock market.

For investors, this presents a unique opportunity. You see, there is a direct correlation between the spotting of UFOs and the share prices for both Lockheed and Boeing.

How? Simple. When a UFO sighting makes the news, social mood shifts towards the paranoid, thereby driving up the share prices of the very military-industrial complex companies we rely on for air defense.

To wit, last November, we made this observation:

“One week after the UFO sightings in New York and Texas, shares of both Lockheed Martin and Boeing went up. Not down. Up.

See for yourself.

Lockheed Martin

Sighting Date Share Price 1 week later %change

NYC 10/14 70.2 71.84 +2.3%
Texas 10/16 70.02 71.78 +2.5%

Boeing

NYC 10/14 71.36 71.5 +.01%
Texas 10/16 70.11 71.66 +.22%

Well folks, it’s happening again.

Thought Catalog reports that two major UFO sightings occurred yesterday over Jerusalem and Utah.

How did shares of Lockheed and Boeing change from one week prior to the sighting until today? Let’s take a look.

Lockheed Martin

January 24th Current %change

78.03 79.32 +1.7%

Boeing

January 24th Current %change

72.73 69.85 -4%



Interesting!

First off, Lockheed is still definitely benefiting from UFO sightings. As was the case in November, shares of the company went up…not down…but up after UFOs were spotted.

But strangely, this time around, shares of Boeing went down…not up…but down after yesterday’s sighting.

What does this mean?

There’s really only one possible explanation. Executives at Lockheed have clearly struck a better technology sharing deal with the inter-dimensional beings, and while we have no hard “proof,” Mr. Market subconsciously understands Lockheed’s advantage and therefore has greater confidence in its ability to protect us from alien invasion, ergo the stronger share price.

Boeing, meanwhile, has become completely immobilized by the Dreamliner fiasco, and has had to turn its attention away from time-traveling anti-gravitational aircraft. This, of course, may make sense in the short term, but for long term investors it would be wise to consider Boeing’s place in the intergalactic aviation world before making any serious bets.

The facts don’t lie.

Source: Minyanville.com

Spaceships landed of Anglesey coast, claims UFO expert

ALIEN spaceships under the sea might sound like the stuff of fiction, but a UFO researcher claims that an incident off the shores of Anglesey could be the best evidence yet of an infamous North Wales close encounter.

However, UFO expert Russ Kellett said that a coastguard document backed his theory that one of three alien craft found off the coast of Anglesey crashed into Lake Bala and caused the Berwyn Mountain incident January 23 1974.

He said: “This information that I have unleashed is a sort of Holy Grail. The Ministry of Defence released documents a year ago and there was nothing about military activity.”

The researcher, who has investigated the UFOs for 23 years, said that the Marine Coastguard document revealed that a military exercise called Operation Photoflash was underway from Liverpool Bay to the North Wales coast on the night of the Berwyn Incident.

Russ believes that the operation used depth charges to locate one alien craft at Puffin Island, another off the Anglesey coast and a further ship near Bangor.

The spaceships then shot out of the sea and into the air.

Russ said that a group of men discovered one of the silver flying saucers while the aliens emerged from one of the crashed ships on a roadside near Llandrillo.

He said: “They were slim humanoid creatures, about five ft six inches tall, with grey skin and wore jumpsuits with belt kits on them.”

Russ added that the men watched the soliders load the aliens into a vehicle and drive away.

The researched believed that the MoD had not released the information to prevent public panic.

He said: “You’ve got something that travels about under the sea without detection and can fly. What a piece of engineering that is.

“People are going to get really worried, because this is what I call super technology.”

Russ also claims to have several fragments of one of the craft.

Documents released by the MoD last year support the theory that a meteor shower caused the bright lights and earthqauke experienced by residents near the Berwyn Incident’s epicentre at Bala Lake.

Source: northwaleschronicle.co.uk

California psychologist: Humanity ready for aliens

"A California psychologist says human beings may be ready to accept evidence of extra-terrestrial intelligence without widespread panic.

Dr. Albert Harrison of the University of California's Davis campus said such a discovery 'may be far less startling for generations that have been brought up with word processors, electronic calculators, avatars and cell phones as compared with earlier generations,' The Scotsman reported Tuesday.'" UPI

A hundred years ago computers, smartphones, space stations, and other technological wonders existed only in the realm of science fiction. If a UFO had landed on the grounds of the White House back then, most people would have turned to religion for an explanation. The public would have been convinced that the extraterrestrials were demons with malevolent intentions. There would have been widespread panic, and society would be in an upheaval.

Today we live in a high-tech world and the idea that extraterrestrials might visit the Earth isn't so alarming. Decades of science fiction movies about UFO's and alien beings have psychologically prepared us for the arrival of visitors from a galaxy far, far away.

Most Americans have a rudimentary knowledge of quantum physics. We are familiar with the counterintuitive concepts of entanglement, the multi-verse theory, and string theory which posits the existence of 11 dimensions.

If physics makes time travel and the idea of an infinite number of universes seem possible, it's not too much of a stretch for us to believe there's intelligent life forms in the universe.

If the US government has proof that we aren't alone in the universe, I hope they will share that information with the public. Christian fundamentalists will panic, but the vast majority of Americans will make peace with the reality that we are not alone.

Follow Robert Paul Reyes on Twitter: http://twitter.com/robertpaulreyes
Source: The american chronicle

The 3 types of extra-terrestrial civilizations

I stumbled upon this video when I checked out the news story titled "World business leaders to discuss UFOs and extra-terrestrial life" and thought I should share this with you.

'Extraterrestrial hypothesis' is now public operative explanation for UFOs in France, U.K. and China

By Alfred Lambremont Webre

Expert panels, military-intelligence agencies, and/or scientists, respectively, in France, U.K., and China now independently confirm that the ‘extraterrestrial hypothesis’ is now their public operative explanation for specific empirical UFO encounters.

According to one source, “The extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH) is the hypothesis that some unidentified flying objects (UFOs) are best explained as being extraterrestrial life or space aliens from other planets occupying physical spacecraft visiting Earth.”

In France, on May 31, 2010, The Progress Report of the Sigma/3AF Commission, a semi-official report, adopted the extraterrestrial hypothesis for specific UFO sightings. According to researcher Antonio Huneeus “A new French report released on May 31, 2010 concluded that UFOs are definitely real and possibly of extraterrestrial origin. The Progress Report of the Sigma/3AF Commission comes from a highly credible source, the Aeronautical & Astronomical Association of France, known as the 3AF, which established a Commission on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena back in May 2008. The Commission’s President is Alain Boudier, a former French Defense attaché, and one of its key members is Jean-Gabriel Greslé, a former fighter pilot who studied at the U.S. Air Force Academy and later became an airliner pilot with Air France, where he experienced a couple of UFO sightings. Greslé has published three UFO books in France, including Unidentified Flying Objects: An Airline Pilot Talks (Guy Trédaniel, 1993).”

In the U.K. on August 4, 2010, the U.K. Ministry of Defence released World War II documents that confirmed that Prime Minister Winston Churchill had adopted the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the operating hypothesis of the U.K. government with regard to specific UFO sightings. In early August, 2010 the U.K. Ministry of Defence made public “an account of a wartime meeting attended by Winston Churchill in which, it is claimed, the prime minister was so concerned about a reported encounter between a UFO and RAF bombers, that he ordered it be kept secret for at least 50 years to prevent ‘mass panic’.

“Nick Pope, who used to investigate UFO sightings for the MoD, said: ‘The interesting thing is that most of the UFO files from that period have been destroyed.

“’But what happened is that a scientist whose grandfather was one of his [Churchill's] bodyguards, said look, Churchill and Eisenhower got together to cover up this phenomenal UFO sighting, that was witnessed by an RAF crew on their way back from a bombing raid.

“’The reason apparently was because Churchill believed it would cause mass panic and it would shatter people's religious views.’”

On August 23, 2010 in China, a planetary astronomer formally announced the extraterrestrial hypothesis as applicable to specific UFO encounters he had studied in notable sightings at the Purple Hills Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Dr. Michael E. Salla notes, “In a speech at a science forum held in the city of Guangzhou on August 23, a veteran Chinese astronomer with almost 40 years experience claimed that some UFOs are extraterrestrial spacecraft. Professor Wang Sichao is a planetary astronomer at the Purple Hills Observatory of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Based on scientific observations of UFOs over his 39-year career, he has concluded that some are powered by antigravity devices.

“He claimed some extraterrestrials are visiting Earth in a Research and Development capacity, and are therefore friendly enough to begin cooperation and mutual exchanges. A summary of Wang’s speech was reported by a number of China newspapers including the influential People’s Daily Online.

“Based on his observations at Purple Hills Observatory and analysis of UFO sightings, Wang was able to conclude that some UFOs are not natural phenomenon, and use antigravity technology. This is how the People’s Daily Online summarized Wang’s reasoning: ‘Wang also found that in the terrestrial space between the height of 130 kilometers and 1,500 kilometers, UFOs have appeared many times. Their flying speed is … as slow as 0.29 kilometers per second [1000 km/hr] and they can fly in the 1,460 kilometers' height for more than 25 minutes. This means UFOs have the anti-gravity ability. Otherwise, they would fall soon.’”

France and the extraterrestrial hypothesis

In reporting in Open Minds on the application of the extraterrestrial hypothesis in the The Progress Report of the Sigma/3AF Commission, researcher Antonio Huneeus states that, “The Sigma/3AF is not a final report but just a work in progress document; nevertheless, it provides good background material on the history of official UFO research in France, a balance of Sigma’s work during the last two years, a brief description of the most significant French cases, and some comments and conclusions. The report begins with a brief history of French official UFO research, which is quite extensive: ‘France is the only country where the collection of Unidentified Aerospace Phenomena (PAN in French) and its scientific study have been assigned since 1977 to a civilian official organization, the CNES (National Center for Space Studies, the French space agency) through the GEIPAN study group.’

Mr. Huneeus continues, “After a short description of this unit, now known as GEIPAN (Study and Information Group on Aerospace Unidentified Phenomena), the report outlines other official or quasi-official French studies, including the famous COMETA (Committee for In-Depth Studies) Report of 1999, issued by a group of high-ranking retired French military and intelligence officers, which concluded that UFOs were real and probably extraterrestrial."

Mr. Huneeus writes, “Members of the Sigma/3AF Commission also met representatives of many other official French military and intelligence organizations that had some UFO involvement in the past. These included the National Gendarmerie, which has collected UFO reports systematically since the 1960s; the General Secretariat of National Defense, which issued an interesting report a few years ago (although I am not aware that it was ever released to the public); the Air Force; and one of France’s intelligence services, the General Directorate for External Security, which admitted through an ‘authorized source’ that UFOs have been monitored by the agency since the early sixties.

"The section on ‘the most important French cases’ provides then a very short descriptions of the following according to ‘Sigma/3AF’ outstanding five incidents:

1. A mass UFO sighting in Madagascar in 1954
2. The landing and close encounters in Valensole in 1965, which was documented by the police
3. The no less famous landing in Trans-en-Provence in 1981
4. A similar case from 1982 (both cases were investigated by the armored and were each published in their reports # 16 and # 17)
5. The sighting of a UFO by several witnesses, between Biarritz and Strasbourg in 1990.

According to Mr Huneeus, “In the Comments section, the Sigma/3AF report uses unambiguous language, for instance: ‘No natural phenomenon can account for the majority of observation reports accompanied by electromagnetic detections made by one or several radars. Both the defense services and air traffic control have been confronted a number of times around the world with unknown aerial intrusions or artificially induced phenomena.’

“Later on, the report goes on to say, ‘The behavior of these devices during encounters with fighter jets or interceptors – some have participated in real swirling battles in the U.S. – suggests they are controlled, guided or led by particularly sophisticated automation.’ And then again, ‘air superiority of the craft concerned, if they are indeed crafts, is such that none of the many interceptions which have been made against them, in the United States for example, have been able to overcome one of these devices.’"

Mr Huneeus states, "After outlining a number of characteristics exhibited by UFOs, such as ‘remarkable accelerations of the craft right after a stationary mode,’ the report indicates: ‘We feel that we must reject the thesis of a terrestrial origin for all the observations made since World War Two. Indeed, if a nation of the world had been able to secretly develop such an armada of exotic craft, like those observed for more than half a century, the means of analysis and strategic logistics available would have permitted their rapid identification.

“’The illegal overflights which they have been guilty of conducting could constitute a casus belli [cause for war].’ The Sigma/3AF experts go on to state that, ‘the above features suggest that in many cases the devices detected, far from being unidentified, are easily recognizable by the aerial defense agencies as part of a technology far ahead of ours.’ And later: “’We have been unable to get any serious indication as to the origin of the aerospace phenomena that is the subject of our research. The technological elements that we selected… allow us to draw some assumptions about the aircraft in question, which do not seem to belong to an identifiable terrestrial technology at the times when they were observed.”’

“The Sigma/3AF report finally agrees with COMETA’s conclusion that we are probably facing an ET presence. That conclusion was quite controversial for a semi-official study like COMETA back in 1999 and was criticized by many in the French press. Yet the Sigma/3AF Commission found no quarrel with it.

Mr. Huneeus concludes, “’Thus, the central hypothesis proposed by the COMETA report still cannot be rejected up to this day and remains perfectly credible,’ they wrote. ‘Many documents and materials examined by the authors of this report confirm it. We have therefore retained, among some others but only as a working hypothesis, the possibility that most of the craft observed can have a non-terrestrial origin.'"

How the extraterrestrial hypothesis about UFOs relates to Exopolitics

Exopolitics is, by the most general definition, the science of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse.

UFOs, however, are only one of the 15 or so separate databases that Exopolitics as a science uses to study the behavior of intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse toward Earth, for example. The UFO database of the UFO phenomenon has been gathered by independent UFOlogists worldwide since at least 1947 in the modern era, and stretches back to ancient times.

As this reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre has stated, “UFOs are a pervasive social meme in our time, as well, in part because UFOs are a meme paradoxically used by the national security state to engineer the extraterrestrial embargo.”

Dr. Michael E. Salla has stated, “Thank you Alfred for again pointing the following: ‘UFOs are a pervasive social meme in our time, as well, in part because UFOs are a meme paradoxically used by the national security state to engineer the extraterrestrial embargo.’

Dr. Salla continues, “That is precisely the situation. In full sincerity and confidence briefed officials can say such things as ‘UFOs have no national security significance and so are not the subject of ongoing secret investigations as claimed by conspiracy theorists.’ What they are not saying is that all reports of UFOs are immediately categorized in something similar to the following. Natural phenomenon, misidentified aircraft, identified advanced classified vehicles, identified extraterrestrial vehicles, etc. Once the identified objects are removed from the database what you have left is a mishmash of anomalous objects placed under the UFO rubric with no national security significance. Essentially, that's what happened with the Project Blue Book reports as Brig General Bollender pointed out in 1969. Hence the feigned non-interest in UFOs that militaries in the U.S., Britain, etc., put out year after year. The continued use of the UFO term does enable the extraterrestrial truth embargo which is why the ‘Exopolitics’ term is so important in putting the public back on track.”

Whenever the extraterrestrial hypothesis is applied to specific UFO sightings and encounters, such as has been done in the cases of France, U.K. and China (above), the national security state’s use of the term ‘UFO’ to continue the extraterrestrial embargo is automatically deconstructed, as UFOs are now authoritatively identified as extraterrestrial in origin

The extraterrestrial hypothesis when applied to specific UFO sightings and encounters makes those UFO sightings and encounters candidates for entry into the Exopolitics database.

UFOs plus the extraterrestrial hypothesis then become UFOs as part of the study of relations among intelligent civilizations in the multi-verse, and part of the working science of Exopolitics.

Source: Examiner.com

Would we make good hosts?

Below is an excerpt from an interview with George Adamski, the famous Polish born American Ufologist who supposedly had intimate contact with extraterrestrials. This interview was taped and documented in the year 1955.

"Q. Are they all friendly?
A. Yes, very friendly, more so than any people on earth. People on earth pretend to be friendly but they are not really friendly to each other as these people are, even the so-called strangers.

Q. If their ships crash on earth or if they are shot as has been reported, do they have any way of protecting themselves?
A. No they do not, although they could. Although it is possible that they could harness this magnetic ray and shoot it out towards us and stop us in our tracks. But this is something they won't do. They claim that they have no right, I asked them about that, and they said they have no right to take revenge for a lack of understanding or ignorance.


Judging by the above excerpt, some more statements made in the interview and the aliens' supposedly benevolent demeanor, I couldn't help but wonder if the very reason for their enigmatic behavior is our own savagery. For now, just forget about the severe human rights violations in Nigeria or Iran, or even a tyrant of a mother-in-law persuading a young woman to kill herself in the name of dowry in your immediate neighborhood for that matter. Let's just look inside ourselves. What would you do, if a drunken bearded man you walk past, makes a remark on your buttocks? How would you react, if your teacher failed you in an exam because he overlooked a small portion of the paper? How would you feel, if your boss promoted an apparently less talented colleague instead of you? In general, how would a normal person react even if he's wronged in the slightest manner? Of course, we've all arrived at a conclusion that it's human nature to feel sadness when we're wronged. Yet, human history has had several of these inhumanly selfless role-models like Jesus Christ or Gandhi who supposedly showed the other cheek when wronged. How is that possible? Weren't they human too?

I feel, there's something logically amiss. Perhaps, there's something fundamentally wrong in most of the things in life that we've accepted to be true. Now that I thought some more about it, I wonder this. Wasn't that drunken man's remark on your buttocks merely a compliment? The teacher on the other hand, gave you a chance to improvise your knowledge while all others got to forget about whatever they had studied and learned. As for the boss, that promotion could have probably meant lesser responsibilities and fewer means to learn.

Is this the way our extraterrestrial visitors think? If so, I definitely believe its this collective attitude that has allowed them to progress so far as to build inexpensive warp drives and travel the stars.

Now that the point is established, let us consider a scenario wherein you are a government appointed scientist who's out over a remote uncharted island, scanning the horizons from an airplane. You spot a tiny band of tribes looking at your craft in awe, worshiping it and dancing in funny patterns. You know that civilization has never been in this part of the world, and that these tribes have little morals that match your upbringing, let alone they believe it's okay to indiscriminately kill and devour another human being from a different tribe. Yet, even if you did land in the middle of their village, they would worship you. They would most certainly be harmless to a technologically and culturally superior being and you know that for a fact. Yet, would you land right between them? Would you still extend your hand to them in friendship? Despite your strong belief in human rights and equality, would you let a random one of those tribesmen sit in your plane?

Okay, now switch this primitive tribe for a little bit more civilized locality; say, a village in a remote part of India where the people have heard about cars and televisions, yet, is rife with petty street violence, domestic violence and flawed political ethics. Would you still pick one of these random villagers and let them sit in your plane, or work for you as a secretary or at least a Janitor? I highly doubt it. I believe, the relationship between humanity and ETs is merely a scaled up version of this scenario, so no.

We will never make good hosts. At least, not just yet. Inducting humans in their societies, or even being allowed into their homes would desecrate their society. Sorry for this extremely morbid post, but unless we make changes within ourselves, we have no right to expect the world to change around us. Sure, there's always going to be a difference between us and them before we make first contact. Sure, that difference is going to remain unless our ET visitors extend their arms and reach out to us (which solely puts the responsibility called first contact on them). But the good news is, it is possible to encourage them. The best way to do so, is to change ourselves bit by bit.

How to spot a fake UFO video - My personal experience

After months of wondering why UFO sightings aren't taken seriously, I came to a conclusion. What might that conclusion be? Is it that most of the sightings, footage and photographs are fakes? No. It's because amateur enthusiasts fail to identify a fake, get excited about it, spread the news like wildfire, and throw away their credibility when someone else finds out the truth for them.

So before you look at an interesting video online (like the ones I post), watch out for these signs.

1) Excessive exclamations: Not all hoaxsters do what they do out of malicious intentions alone. Many do it out of an impulsive rush, which is why they caption their uploads laden with too much emotion. If you see a video captioned something like "THIS IS FOR REAL!!!!!!" or "REAL UFO VIDEO. NO JOKE!!!", it's most likely the work of a faker trying to get hits and earn a quick buck.

2)Lack of detail: An authentic video would have some detail of it in the description. The details could consist of anything ranging from the date and time of shooting, to textual description of what the witness saw, or at the very least, the context of that footage.

3)Lack of editing: Lack of editing is a good sign. Even a simple screen text could mean that the poster knew some basics on video editing, and was trying to put some sensationalism in his video to earn hits. Once this intent and skill level is exposed, there's no telling what else the video uploader might have done to make it look real.

A raw footage with unclear sound and plenty of background noise on the other hand speaks volumes on its authenticity.


4) Comments and ratings disabled: If comments and ratings for a video is disabled, it's most likely a fake, no matter how real it looks. He knows that people are likely to ridicule him and make his negative reputation lose traffic to his channel.

5) Elusive uploader: Try contacting the uploader. If he doesn't reply, he's probably just busy. But if his statements are defensive (like "get lost, I don't have to answer to you"), he's most likely faker.

6) Bad animation and editing: Not only bad ones, but even mediocre ones can be spotted this way. If a real footage was extremely detailed(with a really vivid shape), it would've made it to the news on TV and the poster would have drawn a lot of attention to himself . Otherwise, it would've come off a credible source such as wikileaks, MUFON or a very successful uploader on youtube (in terms of number of videos and hits). On the other hand in case of a not-so-detailed-looking UFO (like a vague disc), an animator wouldn't spend too much time and effort perfectly synchronizing an animation with the subtle camera movements. Even if he did, he's likely to miss out on authentic audio and noise coming from the background.

7) Likes vs Dislikes and not the comments: Every UFO footage on youtube has its share of skeptics, no matter how real or authentic it is. But the like:dislike ratio of the video on the other hand speaks a lot about its authenticity. If more people disliked the video, than liked it in a ratio like 150 : 1, its likely a fake. But don't jump to conclusions if you see something like 1543: 1357. Watch out for the other signs too.

8) UFO flight path: A UFO has better things to do than look for a guy on the ground with a camera from 20,000 feet away and fly right over him so that the cameraman can get a perfect shot at it. Also, a UFO flying towards or away from the cameraman would look quite detailed; enough for you to observe the shadows and lighting on it.

Even seeing none of these signs on a video doesn't necessarily establish its authenticity. Regarding UFO sightings, unfortunately, there is no black area. There's only a grey and a white area. So even if you see a realistic fake UFO footage, the least you could do is give credit to the hoaxster's skill.

Manipulative Extraterrestrial control linked to Human "Exoconsciousness"

Manipulative Extraterrestrial control linked to Human "Exoconsciousness"

by Roger Marsh

Edited by Iain Mackenzie

As humans, we commonly think of humans as having a consciousness and a subconsciousness. It is commonly understood that a capacity for reason is a central part of a human consciousness.

Dr. John Lash's research on the ancient Pagan Gnostics suggest that humans have two distinct consciousness. Our vital primal consciousness is linked to our essence of being human as a feature which is associated with our spiritual interconnectedness to the Earth. This part of our consciousness inspires us to embrace values of empathy, peace and love for each other and for Nature. However, based on Dr. Lash's investigative research, the ancient Pagan Gnostics also appreciated, an "exoconsciousness" which manifests itself in dysfunctional behaviour among humans.

What is the apparent origins of this exoconsciousness? Ancient Pagan Gnostics and David Icke's investigative research on the insights on indigenous peoples, suggest that Manipulative Extraterrestrials have interfered with the biological matrix of humanity. The result of this documented interference is that regressive aliens have "graphed" onto humans a secondary "exo-consciousness". This "eco-consciousness" according to Dr. Lash, acts in the form of a parallel parasitic consciousness.

When humans debate in their own mind whether they should pursue an empathetic way of handling a situation, or a potentially self-centred and destructive way of handling the same situation, Dr. Lash's insights suggest we, as humans, are in fact debating between our own primal/original consciousness as humans, and a regressive alien "exo-consciousness".

The humans which have amplified levels of this parasitic consciousness are driven by the insatiable pursuit of greed and power, which is dysfunctional to humans, but which apparently serves a regressive alien agenda on Earth. Humans with elevated amount of exo-consciousness assist in its corrupt rise to power in a global capitalist "pyramid scheme".

According to Dr. Lash's insights, Manipulative Extratrrestrials which Pagan Gnostics referred to as the "Archons" seek to parasitize humanity through elite-drive authority systems which substantively reflect a regressive alien exo-consciousness.

Dr. Lash elaborates in metahistory.org: The Archons [aspiring regressive alien controllers which operate through authority systems) represent error, not evil. They do not cause mistakes in our learning process, but they affect our thinking so that our mistakes go undetected and extrapolate beyond the scale of correction." Accordingly to our detriment, humans who cannot correct their own minds and redirect their own actions based upon their 'primal human consciousness become potentially controlled by an "exo-consciousness.

Source: Agoracosmopolitan.com

Experts Call On UN To Prepare For Extraterrestrials

The United Nations (UN) should prepare a course of action, just in case the Earth should ever be contacted by extraterrestrials, scientists say in a new, extraterrestrial focused edition of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

The special issue, according to Guardian Science Correspondent Alok Jha, focuses on "all aspects of the search for extraterrestrial life, from astronomy and biology to the political and religious fallout that would result from alien contact."

The issue is currently available online and is dated February 13, 2011.

In one article, Professor John Zarnecki of the Open University and Dr Martin Dominik of the University of St. Andrews say that "a lack of co-ordination can be avoided by creating an overarching framework in a truly global effort governed by an international politically legitimated body." The UN's Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) is ready made for the task, they argue.

According to the organization's official website, COPUOS was established by the UN General Assembly in 1959 in order to "review the scope of international cooperation in peaceful uses of outer space, to devise programs in this field to be undertaken under United Nations auspices, to encourage continued research and the dissemination of information on outer space matters, and to study legal problems arising from the exploration of outer space."

In their paper, Zarnecki and Dominik assert that COPUOS member states should begin focusing on potential extraterrestrial affairs as well, following a format similar to their subcommittees already focused on dealing with threats from asteroids and outer space objects, according to Jha.

Other studies included in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A include a paper by Cambridge University Evolutionary Paleobiology Professor Simon Conway Morris advising those preparing for alien contact to prepare for a species that shares human-like tendencies "towards violence and exploitation," and Pacific Lutheran Theological Seminary Professor Ted Peter reflecting upon the impact of extraterrestrial contact on the world's religions.

"Because our religious traditions formulated their key beliefs within an ancient world view now out of date, would shocking new knowledge dislodge our pre-modern dogmas? Are religious believers Earth-centric, so that contact with ET would de-centre and marginalize our sense of self-importance?" Peters, a professor of systematic theology, wrote, according to the Guardian.

"Do our traditional religions rank us human beings on top of life's hierarchy, so if we meet ETI who are smarter than us will we lose our superior rank? If we are created in God's image, as the biblical traditions teach, will we have to share that divine image with our new neighbors?" he adds, noting that he believed traditional theologians would evolve into "astrotheologians" and that "contact with extraterrestrial intelligence will expand the existing religious vision that all of creation… is the gift of a loving and gracious God."

---

Image Caption: This shows Kenneth Arnold holding a picture of a drawing of the crescent shaped UFO he saw in 1947.

Source: redorbit.com

Wikileaks cable confirms extensive Soviet UFO investigations

The first Wikileaks U.S. diplomatic cable that mentions UFOs has just been released. It is based on comments by Yuriy Zhadobin, chairman of the intelligence service of the former Soviet Republic of Belarus. In the cable prepared by the U.S. Embassy in Minsk, Zhadobin is reported to have said that during the time of the Soviet Union, there were almost unlimited funds for investigating the UFO phenomenon. He laments that after the Soviet break up, Belarus no longer has the funds to investigate UFOs to the extent it once had.

This is what Zhadobin said in the cable just released by the Norwegian newspaper, Aftenposten:

Unlike during the USSR, the department is not engaged in studying paranormal phenomena. [Back then,] we had greater means and opportunities which we could spend on anything and everything. Today the situation is different. Then, when society was excited by something, it entered our sphere of interest. But when it comes to healers, UFOs and such, we just can´t deal with them any more.

Wikileaks has so far only released 2000 of approximately 250,000 diplomatic cables, less than one percent. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper in December 2010, Julian Assange confirmed that some of the unreleased cables do concern UFOs. Those yet to be released cables may reveal the extent to which the U.S. and other countries have investigated, and publicly covered up the UFO phenomenon and its relationship to extraterrestrial life.

Source: exopoliticsinstitute.org

Journalists have a responsibility on UFO disclosure, leaks

By Steve Hammons

The recent and ongoing controversy about releases of sensitive information seems to raise both new and longstanding fundamental points about freedom of the press and the role of journalism in society.

An aspect of the discussion that appears to many people as an odd side issue is the reference to unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in some documents or materials.

However, this topic might serve as a unique example about the way we look at the roles of journalism, government and citizens on an issue that could be both important to know about and also require discretion and sensitivity.

Today's journalists and many other segments of society face continual changes in the evolving economy, technological development, scientific updates and the many other aspects of everyday life.

Journalism in particular is with dealing longstanding ethical and professional guidelines about freedom of the press and responsible reporting. These are combined with a changing landscape of Internet technology and certain characteristics of major media companies.

BALANCING ACT

The touchstone of the U.S. Constitution and its provisions outlining freedom of speech and freedom of the press continue to be fundamental reference points. Many of the U.S. Constitution's other attempts to strengthen human liberty are equally valuable and often equally controversial.

The task of balancing these freedoms with responsible behavior and common-sense discretion is now front and center in discussions about various current events.

And, odd as it may seem, the UFO subject is one of these current challenges.

Just like other sensitive subjects involving national security, some people who have researched the UFO situation claim that a high level of restriction by governments on information about UFOs is interfering with the right of citizens to know what their governments are doing.

And, the argument extends to the view that human beings at the grassroots of society have a need to know about certain subjects that could affect them, including unusual and unconventional discoveries and developments.

The counterpoint to this view is that some subjects must be kept secret for the sake of the greater good of maintaining national defense. And, in many cases, international alliances and friendships among nations and societies are also at stake.

How should the profession and craft of journalism handle these factors?

When the additional challenges of certain perspectives by media bosses in a time of changing economic dynamics come into play, journalists are now, as they often have been, faced with soul-searching dilemmas.

REPORTING ON MYSTERIES

In the case of unusual and unconventional scientific subjects, additional obstacles for journalism include self-censorship by media management and often by certain elements of scientific communities. These factors may also dovetail with defense-related information restriction for reasons of strategic national and global safety as well as tactical operational security.

Despite the statements from people with various viewpoints that decisions and judgment about the balance between security and freedom of the press are easy and clear cut, this is probably not always the case.

As we know, sometimes a "top secret" classification is used to cover up wrongdoing and inappropriate conduct.

At the same time, other classified situations, including highly compartmented and need-to-know circumstances, might truly require robust information security for a number of legitimate reasons.

According to some researchers, the UFO situation falls into a complex category of emerging scientific developments that could significantly change our views of Earth, the universe, life and the human race. It may be quite complex because the various kinds of unusual flying objects seen over the decades and centuries are probably associated with even more surprising mysteries.

Extraterrestrial visitors, multiple dimensions, space-time anomalies, forgotten histories of human civilization, undiscovered aspects of human DNA, extrasensory perception and other edge-science subjects have all been linked to the UFO phenomena, both directly and indirectly.

Some researchers indicate that may only be the tip of the iceberg.

Responsible journalism on these kinds of subjects seems to have been somewhat limited to date. But that does not mean today's journalists are incapable of handling the situation responsibly and professionally.

Understanding various security implications of unconventional situations that could affect the safety of American and global society must be part of journalistic considerations and judgment.

Important foundational elements of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights are also factors that are key parts of responsible journalism in days past, now and in the future.

NOTE TO READERS: Please visit my Joint Recon Study Group site at http://jointreconstudygroup.blogspot.com and my Transcendent TV & Media site at http://tvtranscend.blogspot.com.

Source: ufodigest.com

Famous hacker Gary McKinnon's witness account

I saw this quite a while ago, but I didn't really remember his name. Now that I've stumbled upon this video, I thought I should show this to you.



Gary McKinnon (born 10 February 1966) is a Scottish systems administrator and hacker who has been accused of what one US prosecutor claims is the "biggest military computer hack of all time," although McKinnon himself states that he was merely looking for evidence of free energy suppression and a cover-up of UFO activity and other technologies potentially useful to the public. After a series of legal proceedings in England, McKinnon is currently awaiting extradition to the United States.

Source: Wikipedia

UFO community links recent bird, wild life death to alien technology

Submitted by Dave Masko on 2011-01-05

In what’s viewed as a scene from a horror movie, both birds and other wildlife are dying on a massive scale from Beebee, Arkansas, to central Oregon coast beaches and beyond; while the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) points to alien technology as interfering with bird migration patterns and other factors as UFO visits become more prominent in the new year.

Birds along Oregon coast staying grounded

MUFON’s “UFO community” has been sending out guidance to investigators of the mysterious bird and wildlife animal deaths. One popular theory among UFO experts is a “cloaking device,” used to make alien spacecraft invisible, as possibly causing the birds in Arkansas and other areas to fly into it and die as birds often do when encountering aircraft flying at vast speeds.

Because UFO sightings are often over bodies of water, such as the Arkansas River, MUFON believes the dead drum fish that’s been reported in the hundreds of thousands may be linked to exposure to UFO craft and lights.

“There’s been regular UFO sightings south of Beebee in Minden, Louisiana. The object spotted was an orb or disc that was pulsing colors and eventually disappeared. The object’s relationship to what’s been happening in BeeBee is not yet known,” stats a MUFON official.

MUFON also reports other massive bird and wildlife deaths, to include recent deaths of sea lions and thousands of star fish here at Stonefield Beach, is “appearing almost regularly across the globe.”

Locals here at Stonefield Beach can still recall how the noise of dead sea lions stretched like a tight wire through the air as dozens of these mammals gasped for their last breath along this lonely stretch of beach where regular UFO sightings are reported.

While such information would have been dismissed as foolish a few years ago, that’s not the case today with most people believing in alien visitors, says a MUFON spokesman here at Stonefield Beach.

Meanwhile, both American and foreign scientists believe the recent deaths of tens of thousands of birds is due to “atmospheric phenomena.”

Still, they’ve not ruled out theories offered by MUFON.

Stonefield is a popular location for Oregon “watchers” viewing of unidentifiable flying object (UFO) sightings via “catching some lights” at this remote location along the central Oregon coast that has become ground zero for strange winter solstice happenings.

MUFON advisors and members of “The Trails End Paranormal Society of Oregon” have been busy as of late with numerous worldwide queries about the recent bird and wildlife deaths.

In fact, MUFON is tracking UFO sightings near Elista, the capital of the Republic of Kalmykia in southern Russia. According to reports, more than 200 people in Elista reported UFO sightings over a ten-day period beginning Dec. 22, 2010.

MUFON and other European Union UFO organizations dispatched investigators to Elista and were told by witnesses about two “concentric circles in the sky over the city with birds massing near the circles. Bright lights were also reported in and around the city as UFO sightings continue into the new year.

At the same time, MUFON reports more “is being revealed globally about contacts with UFOs,” to include a statement from WikiLeaks Julian Assange that his international organization has “thousands of UFO documents” that MUFON believes will shed new light on why there’s been so many recent UFO sightings, and how are the sightings related to recent deaths of birds, fish and other wildlife worldwide.

“If WikiLeaks has UFO documents that can help explain on all these mysterious bird and other animal deaths, than the world should know about it. WikiLeaks is said to have UFO documents that have never seen the light of day and that interests us,” noted a MUFON spokesman.

For example, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, who’s a former head of state of the Republic of Kalmykia and current the Chairman of the World Chess Federation, was quoted by Pravda on Dec. 29, 2010, that NASA has “4,000 UFO documents” that need to be disclosed.

Ilyumzhinov also noted that he “was not surprised” about these continuing UFO sightings over his city because he’s claimed to have “met and communicated with extraterrestrial creatures.”

Source: huliq.com

Excerpt 4: From the declassified government files - Q&A with Adamski

The following is a copy of a tape recording recieved from America of answers given by Mr. George on 16th of June, 1955. This is in answer to the many questions sent to him by F.W.G Dicson and D.R. Weeber of the above group. We trust this will enlighten many of you people who are searching for the truth on the mysteries of Flying Saucers. Our aim is to give you this truth as we know it.

"This is June 16th, 1955, and George Adamski speaking. I have a list of questions that have been sent to me and I will answer these so as to make clear some of the things that are puzzling the public, and Lucy McGuiness, my secretary, will be asking the questions and I will answer them.

Continuation from Excerpt 3

Q. How can these ships sail through space without being hit by meteors?
A. Well, they have a force field, their own gravity, their own atmosphere, as I have stated before, which is known as a forcefield and is a negative forcefield radiating from the body of the ship, and anything flying through space and any space debris is also negative, but space is positive, therefore, it will repel anything that might be coming towards the ship.

Q. Is space hot or cold, does it have any layers of different temperatures?
A. Well, it has hot layers, warm layers and very cold layers of atmosphere and conditions in space but traveling at the speed you do and carrying your own atmosphere and your own gravity you do not come in contact with it directly as you would without its protection.

Q. Your new book "Inside the space ships" gives many of these answers doesn't it?
A. Yes it does. It gives quite a number of things in reference to life and many other things.

Q. And more information about their thoughts?
A. Yes, about the way they live, and how they think, their entertainment and quite a number of things.

Q. And do they have a lot of entertainment on those planets as well as work and play?
A. Yes they do, they have beautiful music far greater than we have attained so far and all their entertainment is more or less kind of class work, because they learn from their entertainment the gracefulness of their body, like dancing gives gracefulness of the body, everything is done with the purpose of learning - always learning, that is their whole desire and the idea behind it is that the more they learn about the laws of nature and comply with them, the more they render their service unto their Creator, and the more they please their Creator. That's their major point of living, to please their Creator, the Supreme Intelligence of the Universe, not like we, we are out to please ourselves and seldom think of our creator except when we get into trouble, but they are constantly in thought of the Creator and do everything with that thought and to please their creator to the best of their ability, and the best of their knowledge. They look upon each other as a divine creation and therefore they do not harm each other as we do here on earth.

Q. Then it is all done with joy?
A. Yes, all done with joy out and what we call universal love and so forth. In other words they see themselves in the other fellow and they would't want to be hurt so they won't hurt the other fellow, and I believe it is time for religious groups all over the world to take this particular lesson and it is the only hope to save civilization from total destruction, by the religious groups taking up this method and practicing by preaching it, and not only preaching it but practicing it - PUT IT TO WORK.


The end

Excerpt 3: From the declassified government files -Q&A with Adamski

Adamski Flying Saucer Group

The following is a copy of a tape recording recieved from America of answers given by Mr. George on 16th of June, 1955. This is in answer to the many questions sent to him by F.W.G Dicson and D.R. Weeber of the above group. We trust this will enlighten many of you people who are searching for the truth on the mysteries of Flying Saucers. Our aim is to give you this truth as we know it.

"This is June 16th, 1955, and George Adamski speaking. I have a list of questions that have been sent to me and I will answer these so as to make clear some of the things that are puzzling the public, and Lucy McGuiness, my secretary, will be asking the questions and I will answer them.


Continued from excerpt 2

Q. Have they birds and animals and fish and flowers?
A. No different than our own for we must admit our earth is born of space, for if it is born of space it has got its chemicals of which it is composed out of space. The other planets born of the same space, and especially our own system should not have reproduced anything different than this planet has, chemically speaking.

Q. What do the people eat?
A. They are mostly vegetarians, although if they come to your home and you have nothing but meat, they will eat it, and they will also eat it on the planet if that should be a necessity.

Q. Do they raise stock there for food purposes like we do?
A. No, they do not.

Q. Would it be possible for people from other planets to come to earth land in a flying saucer and to get a job or work in some way here, live among us as our neighbours and friends without being recognized?
A. Yes, it is very possible, in fact they could marry and no one would know the difference.

Q. Can they read our thoughts?
A. Yes, they can read our thoughts very well, although we are not well developed in that field but most of our salesmen and people dealing with people read other people ,and knowing before hand just what the reaction of individual will be, with whom they have developed it to a far greater extent than we do, therefore they are able to read us much easier.

Q. Then if we met any of them we would have no difficulty in talking with them.
A. Not at all.

Q. Could we entertain them in our homes as friends, and feed them and such that, and be comfortable with them?
A. No different than we do our own friends now, in fact a lot more comfortable.

Q. How can we get to meet them?
A. Well that is a big question, I have been asked that a thousand times, and it seems that they choose their people somehow, and why I wouldn't know but they have picked up and made contacts with people from the lowest so called talent base of earth man to the highest already. They seen to be picking up in all fields of endeavour and no one can ever tell who might be the next athough you do not need such a great education for such a contact, but it is better if you have a broader view of life, as they could use you a lot better, in other words they could use you as a servant to spread the good news; but they do not contact all phases. Their greatest and important part, that I might say is necessary for an individual to be in, for the contact to be made is alert, to be alert; you don't have to concentrate, meditate or anything like that, but be alert. Let me illustrate this little bit this way. For instance two men walk into a place for a drink, they both get the same drink, and they have the same drink, then they walk out of the place, and one man says (we will say this is Jim talking to Dick) "Say Jim, did you see that beautiful picture on the bar or did you see that beautiful mantlepiece hanging over in that corner?" and dick said "Heck! I haven't seen anything like that. When did you see it? I was in the same place and saw nothing". Proving, that one man was alert and saw everything that was in that room, while the other fellow was not. That is what I mean by alertness.

Q. Would it be wise to use a flashlight in trying to attract their attention or signal them?
A. It is dangerous because after all they are not superhuman beings as some people try to make them out to be, they are too, wondering sometimes what we are going to do, and in cases like that you throw a beam of light against them and that could be something dangerous, so not knowing what might be in that beam they will throw a ray at you which will knock you down, which has been known to do and not to hurt you in any way but it does frighten you a little bit. For instance, this case down here in what you call Scout master you probably have heard about, when he started hatching the waves at their ship with a machete. Well supposing that machete had stuck into the crown of the ship, he would have completed the circuit in this electrical machine and he would have been electrocuted, and it was lucky for him that each time he struck at the ship with the machete a portion of it broke off and made no contact. So seeing that they shot a ray at him and knocked him down and of course this was not hot, but you know a rope is not hot but can burn your hand. Well, this is about the way this happened and he got burnt a little bit, but it saved his life by frightening him that way and getting him away from the ship, so you see that is a dangerous thing to do to focus the light on them. It is better if you are going to signal, signal the light on the ground, towards the ground, they'll see it that's what they need.

Q. Have they decreased in number these space people?
A. No they have not. They are increasing rather than decreasing. Last year there were many more of them than ever before and there were 82 personal contacts made throughout the world, yet the papers only carry two contacts out of 82.

Q. Is the sun hot?
A. The sun is not as near as we can tell now because the closer we go towards the sun in our own planes the colder it gets. It looks like the radiation that comes from the sun, once it hits our atmosphere, it is there that it begins to heat and especially when it hits our earth, as well as the light that is produced by the same method.

Will be continued in the next post..

Excerpt 2: From the declassified government files - Q&A with Adamski

Adamski Flying Saucer Group

The following is a copy of a tape recording recieved from America of answers given by Mr. George on 16th of June, 1955. This is in answer to the many questions sent to him by F.W.G Dicson and D.R. Weeber of the above group. We trust this will enlighten many of you people who are searching for the truth on the mysteries of Flying Saucers. Our aim is to give you this truth as we know it.

"This is June 16th, 1955, and George Adamski speaking. I have a list of questions that have been sent to me and I will answer these so as to make clear some of the things that are puzzling the public, and Lucy McGuiness, my secretary, will be asking the questions and I will answer them.

continuation of excerpt 1 from here..

Q. Have you met any women on any of these ships?
A. Yes, there are women on all ships, that is, the big ships especially. I have heard of a ship landing, the saucer type, a very large one, where there were five men and two beautiful brunette women all averaging 5' to 6'1''. The women were around 5'6'' to 5'8'' while the men were around 6' to 6'1''.

Q. Have you ever been taken to another planet?
A. No, I have not.

Q. Has anyone that you know of ever been taken to another planet?
A. I have heard of cases where men have been taken to other planets. Just recently there was a a man giving a lecture (Nelson) in Chicago saying that he was taken to two planets ,Mars and Venus, as well as the moon, and I have some of his letters that he wrote to me prior to his lecture. At that time he did not go out, but since then he did and of course, I believe his case, only on these grounds, that while my book "Inside a Space ship" is not yet out, but will be out in a few days, no one read the script and yet he had the same information which I have written about in the book, meaning then that he has contacted another group of Venusians different from mine, and must have got this information from that group, on these grounds I base the case as being true as far as I know.

Q. How far our have you been taken?
A. Well I was taken pretty close to one other planet like that of Venus but never landed on it.

Q. Is space sunny or is it just black dark?
A. It is darkness. The further out in space you get, the darker it gets, although if any object that was moving through space it seems to be a little darker than space itself so you can still detect it even with your own eyes.

Q. Is there life on the moon?
A. Yes there are plenty of inhabitants on the moon, in fact the space people have bases on the moon and quite a number of them.

Q. Do you know what the bridge on the moon is which has recently been discovered by Astronomers. Does it cross a deep canyon or water or what?
A. Well it seems to be crossing a canyon, what it is, (and it is probably not built by man), that is hard to say until you land on it and investigate it. It could be made by nature just that way, for even made by nature is a feat in itself, for it is 250 feet in length it has been reported. I have that report from the "Sky and Telescope" magazine, which is published by Harvard a couple of years ago, this was given out.

Q. Do they have weather on the moon like we have, changing storms and such as that, or do they have extremes of hot and cold?
A. Well, they have the extreme hot and cold, the same as we have it - we have it on earth as well, and astronomy will never prove facts to the exact state that's one sure think. It makes many other forms of science to conform this thing since none of the scientists that talk about this have ever gone themselves to prove it. They are only speculating or theorizing.

Q. There have been reports throughout the years of mysterious light on the moon, sometimes these things last a long time and sometimes they are only flashes now and then, can you explain those?
A. Well surely they would not be there unless somebody would operate them or produce them. There has to be some sort of intelligence to bring forth these odd manifestations as we call them. As I have stated before, our instruments that we have, as good as they are they are not good enough yet to give us an exact answer to all these questions.

Q. Are there oceans on the moon?
A. There is water on the moon, or there is moisture on the moon - there is bound to be because chemistry will tell you that if is 240 degrees on one side and 240 below zero on the other side that these two extremities are going to meet, and anybody who studies chemistry knows that once they meet they produce moisture themselves automatically, also produce a temperate zone at the very spot they meet, they have got to blend some place.

Q. Well, about those extreme temperatures, Halley says there are some to the rising of 240 degrees.
A. No, they are not exactly right because as I stated before we haven't got the proper instruments yet, that will give us the exact truth and common sense tells us that if the rays of the sun coming our way will heat by opposing what they call pressure which is caused by friction that these rays do heat, it is common sense that we, going out from here may strike in this way a certain amount of heat. This is going ot be created through friction opposing the atmosphere and we have no way of knowing just what that percentage would be, how would we know exact temperature then anywhere else?

Q. Do the people of the other planets worship the same God as we do on earth?
A. Well, they don't call it God as we do any more than they call the planets Venus, Mars and so forth as we do. They name their planets by orbits, only, which is logical thing to do because that would be universal, and so it is true with their word for the name of God, instead using the word God they say Supreme Being or the Universe or Supreme Intelligence of the universe which is even broader than the word God.

Q. Do they have a Sabbath day that they observe?
A. A sabbath day to them is every day because every day is a holy day of the Supreme Being and perpetuated by the Supreme Intelligence of the Universe. And that being holy they consider all things holy.

Q. Do they have everlasting life or are they born and do they die?
A. They have everlasting life when it comes to life, but forms must change and therefore in speaking of forms dying they do not actually die but there is transformation of going back to the true essence from which they came while the intelligence that occupied that form goes on to the next person and takes on another form, which in this world we call death they only call it transmutation.

Q. What is the average span of life there on the other planets?
A. The average span of life on planet Venus for example is thousand years or so, although that should not be a mystery because the bible tells you that when the firmament was over the earth that there was a thousand years life here as well and that Methusale had lived to 999 years.

Q. What is their mode of living, do they have cities and country life and rural districts like we have?
A. The mode of living is not much different from our own. They are human beings like we are. Once we get that into our heads the mystery will begin to vanish, but they are human being like ourselves, and they have very much the problems in some things that we have. For instance they have the problem of having to wash their faces and keeping their bodies clean, and things like that, except that they have solved the economic problem far better than we have, where the worries and tensions that we have to go through are no long prevailing.

Q. Do they work for a living?
A. Well they have been one time, but they have harness all the powers that we are harnessing, they harness it for construction to produce or do their work for them, and so as a result of it they do very little work about 2 hours out of every 24 hours of our time.

Q. But they have a home life like we do?
A. Yes, on a universal basis, in other words every child is given equal education according to his talent, what he is adapted for. Full support to the development of that talent as it realises that it renders a service to the while that the while could not operate without it either.

Q. Well does that educational system cease after so many years?
A. No it doesn't. They keep on learning, that is the way they move on from planet to planet as would from classroom, for graduation which is never attained because eternity is eternity.

Q. Do they have churches and school houses and such as that?
A. They do not have them in the same sense that we have, but their churches or school houses are one and the same thing. Put it that way because they learn the universal laws which are also of their creator and that of man as a unit combination, no division.

Continued in the next post..

Excerpt 1: From the declassified government files -Q&A with Adamski

Adamski Flying Saucer Group

The following is a copy of a tape recording recieved from America of answers given by Mr. George on 16th of June, 1955. This is in answer to the many questions sent to him by F.W.G Dicson and D.R. Weeber of the above group. We trust this will enlighten many of you people who are searching for the truth on the mysteries of Flying Saucers. Our aim is to give you this truth as we know it.

"This is June 16th, 1955, and George Adamski speaking. I have a list of questions that have been sent to me and I will answer these so as to make clear some of the things that are puzzling the public, and Lucy McGuiness, my secretary, will be asking the questions and I will answer them.

Q. Are the flying saucers solid?
A. Yes they are solid, just as solid as anything in this world is, just as solid as our planes are.

Q. Have you ever been in one?
A. Yes, I have been in them.

Q. What are they made of?
A. They are made of material just like material of our own; most of the analysis that has come through shows much aluminium and so forth. There are other minerals I have been informed, that are not found on this earth, but that does not mean they are not here.

Q. What do they use for power?
A. Well, for power it is commonly known to all men of the world as static electricity, the same thing that produces our lightning, this is harness up and put into propulsive states later known as a magnetic kind of force or magnetic propulsion.

Q. Are all of these saucers humanly controlled?
A. All above twelve feet yes, twelve feet in diameter they are humanly controlled, anything below twelve feet is not.

Q. What is the purpose of those under twelve feet?
A. Those under twelve feet are instrument type of saucers, they are sent out to measure atmospheric conditions, the chemical conditions within space and so on and so forth and if they are finally lost or their remote control is lost then they sometimes disintegrate them in space and sometimes they blow up here and there, and people report explosions. Some have been found to come to earth in a jelly-like form already disintegrating any by the time you pick up the jelly there is nothing but a bad odour left - the jelly is gone.

Q. Are there different types and styles of these saucers?
A. Yes, there are different types and styles, so to speak, and different sizes. They vary in various designs - there are seven different designs so far that have been detected.

Q. Does that indicate the planet they are from or the purpose they are used for?
A. No, that does not indicate the planet they are from nor the purpose either. There just happen to be different designs the same as we have many different designs in different things.

Q. What kind of instruments do they have?
A. Well, all types of instruments. Every type of instrument that could be imagined, for the work they almost have to have it since they are traveling in space. There is so much more to be encountered and expected than we do in our own atmosphere.

Q. Are they like ours in our planes?
A. What do you mean like ours?

Q. Well are there needles and compasses and such like?
A. No, there are no needles or compasses like that, everything is a colour chart or colour graphs.

Q. Sometimes these saucers and space ships are seen in different lights and sometimes they even seem to change colours as they are being observed, why is this?
A. That is because of these different coloured graphs. As they go into operation they change colour, each colour means something, and the domes or canopies being transparent naturally reflect the colour to the outside from these graphs, and as the graphs change colour, so does the outside change colour with them as a reflection.

Q. Have you ever flown in a flying saucer?
A. Yes.

Q. How can they move with such speed and make those sharp turns?
A. That is very simple. We are moving at a terrific speed on earth, say on one phase of it there is 18.5 mile, nearly 19 miles per second which is a 24 hour basis. And on the orbit side of the situation is 600,000,000 miles per year, and of course we know nothing about any speed of any kind that this earth is moving at all. And they have learned that law and moved complied with nature and harnessed the same powers that motivates the planets and so they are able to create their own atmosphere, their own gravity and as a result of it they don't know anything about movement any more than we do on earth.

Q. How did you feel when you were travelling in one?
A. Not any more than I do on earth right now, or anybody else. We are sitting on this earth moving at this terrific speed and do not know anything about it.

Q. How far out did you go in the saucer?
A. Well, quite a way. I went over the moon, the other side of the moon and quite a distance.

Q. In the Saucer?
A. Not in the saucer, but in the mother ship. The saucer only picked me up on the ground and took me to the mother ship, some 20,000 feet up or so.

Q. Can a saucer travel inter planetary?
A. No they cannot. They are carried by the mother ships or as they are known cigar-shaped types. Cigar-shaped types are a virtual power plant you might say.

Q. Do they recharge saucers sometimes?
A. They do, yes.

Q. How large would you say the mother ships are?
A. Well, the mother ships vary from 500 feet to up to seven miles in length. They have been reported even larger than that, while the saucers again that are piloted are anything from 12 feet on to 1200 feet in diameter.

Q. Are they made of the same materials as the saucers?
A. Yes they are. They are made of very much the same material, except the mother ships are, of course, heavier material than the saucers, much heavier because they are bigger structure, bigger ships and call for greater strength.

Q. Are the instruments inside them the same as in the saucers?
A. No, in the mother ship there are many more instrumentals for many more purposes than what the saucers have. The saucer is nothing but a scout.

Q. Do the big ships ever com to earth or do they ever land on any planet?
A. Well they have been reported but nobody has been able to verify where they have landed someplace, but I have never been able to track it down, but as far as I know they have not landed.

Q. Do they use the same type of power as the saucers?
A. Yes they are the major accumulator of this power it might be said, or condensors of this major power.

Q. Do they use motors and transformers and aerials and such as that?
A. Yes, not aerials, well, they do in their way, for communications sometimes, but mostly it is generators and condensors and some motors, however those motors are very silent, but I wouldn't know whether they are really motors or not.

Q. Why are they coming our way now?
A. Well , it is not because we are bad or indifferent; it is mostly because the earth itself is shifting and the evidence of standing for Admiral Bird, when at Little America prior to the war, and he reported that there was nothing but ice and snow there, yet in 1946 when he went there he reported that ice and snow are thawing and lakes are forming which proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the earth has taken a shift and is still shifting according to some scientists, and they are observing that as a relationship to the planet naturally. We are able to detect earthquakes at a great distance by seismographs, and they have instruments to be able to detect the shift like that of this earth and know the relationship between two planets on the magnetic line of force will change somewhat, and they are observing that and will watch it and are mapping it.

Q. Then their major purpose is for their own scientific knowledge?
A. That's true.

Q. Are they all friendly?
A. Yes, very friendly, more so than any people on earth. People on earth pretend to be friendly but they are not really friendly to each other as these people are, even the so-called strangers.

Q. What planets are they coming from?
A. Well the ones that I have contacted are from Mars, Venus and Saturn although I have reports here from Neptune and Uranus as well. That means give planets in our system.

Q. Have you had any reports from planets from other systems?
A. No, I have not, but that does not mean they are not coming, because lodestar 359 has been checked for years and now for its code system which is supposed to be coming from there, whether it as been deciphered or not or what ever has been learned about has not been released, and the United States Navy has a big instrument on its building in Washington for that purpose and has had it for years.

Q. Are the people from different planets different from each other?
A. No, they are not, no more than the people are different from each other among nations in our own world.

Q. There have been several reports in the last few years of personal contacts. When was the last time that the people in planets contacted the earth like they are now?
A. According to some reports it is round 2000 years ago, when they made contact with people on earth by landing, and since then they have been observing the earth steadily but not landing until recently, and according to the information I have received from them they said we have not developed very much, because we were killing men then and we are still killing men.

Q. Well is this the fulfilling of Prophecies would you say?
A. I would say it is because in the Bible it tells you that Angel men the Son of God, or something of that nature would be coming forth from heaven to earth in due time and the proper time, and this would seem to be the situation.

Q. Well, since their purpose for coming is scientific, they are definitely not coming to save us, but can they help us in any way?
A. They are not coming to save anybody, no one can save anyone, each one must save himself if there be any saving, but they are here and will help us if we desire that help. That is no different than if a man is hungry you set the table then he must do the eating if he is going to fulfill his hunger, and the same thing they can do, they can give us information and we can take them or leave them and if we take them, we can better our conditions.

Q. There have been reports of crashes between earth planes and some of these air planetary craft. Was this deliberate on the part of the space people?
A. It was not. Never deliberate on their part, but our aggression and our so called egotism caused these accidents, which could be called accidents and nothing more, besides we are very poorly alerted, or you might say very poorly informed in reference to what kind of power they use in all, and we sometimes come a little bit close or too close to the so called force field that is always round their ships and once that happens we have the accidents.

Q. If their ships crash on earth or if they are shot as has been reported, do they have any way of protecting themselves?
A. No they do not, although they could. Although it is possible that they could harness this magnetic ray and shoot it out towards us and stop us in our tracks. But this is something they won't do. They claim that they have no right, I asked them about that, and they said they have no right to take revenge for a lack of understanding or ignorance.

Q. Do they have any television or things like that in their ships?
A. Yes they do have something like television, not exactly like the television we have, but similar to that, that registers any and every condition of vibration or frequency that they want to detect on earth, including my speaking right now could be picked up by them, as well as their learning languages if they do not happen to know, a language, they learn it that way. For an example, if I asked you to bring forward a chair I must have a picture of that chair in my mind then say the word commanding you, and then proceed to act, and they get all of that and keep repeating till they know what it means.

Continued in the next post...